<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conceptric &#187; enterprise systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conceptric.co.uk/tag/enterprise-systems/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conceptric.co.uk</link>
	<description>Ideas and Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Purposeful technology</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/purposeful-technology.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/purposeful-technology.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Whinfrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conceptric.co.uk/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Information technology projects frequently catch the headlines, but usually due to spectacular failures. The problem usually results from not asking whether the system is needed at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point to keep in mind is that the business process comes first. After all, businesses were here long before the <abbr title="Information Technology">IT</abbr> department was born. How do you expect to add technology into the equation without understanding you own business domain?</p>
<h3>Define your business.</h3>
<p>When developing business processes try to keep everything as simple as possible. Simple processes are likely to be followed: complex ones won&#8217;t. This is definitely true of written procedures, but human employees have the ability to sift through the junk and ignore it; you may not like that but it&#8217;s true. </p>
<p>Computers on the other hand don&#8217;t share this aptitude. Your software developers may try to ensure the software follows your monolithic procedures, but the conflicts ignored by human employees will have to be resolved; a long and expensive process.</p>
<p>A systematic approach to this analysis can help, especially with the inevitable documentation, take a look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Process_Modeling">business process modeling</a> and the <a href="http://www.bpmn.org/"><abbr title="Object Management Group">OMG</abbr> notation</a>.</p>
<p>Well implemented processes will be familiar to your staff and any software based on them equally so, saving a fortune on training. </p>
<h3>What is success?</h3>
<p>Now you&#8217;ve got a minimalist set of effective processes, you&#8217;re in a position to consider how the application of software and hardware systems might improve or expand your business, and bear in mind that it might not.</p>
<p>What will success would look like? It too needs to be defined as simply as possible if you&#8217;re going to recognise it. Frequently at the start of projects everyone is so excited that this step is lost. It is either overlooked or results in a requirements document so complex nobody can be bothered to read it.</p>
<p>Ask yourself how many other business purchases you would make without actually considering what you&#8217;re expecting to have delivered. Would you be happy if you were hoping for a photocopier and ended up with a filing cabinet?</p>
<h3>Get involved.</h3>
<p>Most organisations expect their involvement to end once they&#8217;ve specified their requirements. The developer will go away, build the software, and deliver it perfect and on schedule. OK, maybe that&#8217;s an exaggeration, but placing your staff in the development team is not an optional extra. </p>
<p>They&#8217;re likely to spend substantial time working closely with the developers, it&#8217;ll be worth it, you&#8217;re likely to get a better system. Most will be involved in user testing, but the customer representative is a key role representing the business interests within the team. Customers are not project managers, they are focused on the benefits to the business and its operational goals.</p>
<p>Primarily involve people that actually undertake the work this system is meant to enhance, and those that will continue to use it. There&#8217;s a huge temptation for senior management to attempt to fulfil this role, but they usually know next to nothing about the processes in question, so resist it. There is a vital role for senior sponsorship, but it&#8217;s not in the development team.</p>
<p>Resulting software will be intuitive, and the <a href="http://www.conceptric.co.uk/what-is-computer-literacy.htm">computer literate</a> will be able to understand it based on their knowledge of their current job, and of course your procedures.</p>
<h3>The pay back.</h3>
<p>Get the basics right &#8212; develop good business processes, define success, and build an effective team &#8212; and your project has a much better chance of delivering satisfaction, on time, and to budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/purposeful-technology.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
