<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conceptric &#187; blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conceptric.co.uk/tag/blogging/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conceptric.co.uk</link>
	<description>Ideas and Applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Realigning Conceptric</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/realigning-conceptric.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/realigning-conceptric.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Whinfrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freelance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conceptric.co.uk/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a few informal projects, Conceptric is taking on a more business like persona. It's becoming my freelance trading name, and as such needs a little reorganisation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This website contains information on a range of my personal interests, only a sub-set of which match my business goals. I want to demonstrate my capabilities rather than directly sell them, so a blog still makes sense. That said, I think a distinction between the two interest groups is required.</p>

<p>I want to continue blogging on personal topics: particularly investment, but anything else continues to be fair game. They&#8217;re going to have their own section of the site, but I need to bear in mind that today&#8217;s interest may become the business of tomorrow.</p>

<p>The work I&#8217;m targeting must determine content that&#8217;s pertinent to the business blog. I&#8217;ve focused on web development and administration to date, and I think this will continue. However, I could leverage my experience in project management and engineering teams better.</p>

<p>I&#8217;d like to improve the <abbr title="Really Simple Syndication">RSS</abbr> provision and integrate other social media on the site, but that&#8217;s for another post.</p>

<p>Although I&#8217;m going to radically change the category structure on the site, I&#8217;m keen to avoid breaking the Web. This is where the <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks">permalinks</a> should come into their own&#8230; I hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/realigning-conceptric.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatomy of a semantic blog</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/anatomy-of-a-semantic-blog.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/anatomy-of-a-semantic-blog.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Whinfrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameswhinfrey.co.uk/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whilst working on a new Wordpress theme I started wondering what makes a blog semantic. How do you use the mark&#8212;up to convey meaning about the content?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the components of a blog post?</p>

<ul>
    <li>The title of the post.</li>
    <li>The name of the author.</li>
    <li>The date on which the post was published.</li>
    <li>An excerpt from the content.</li>
    <li>The post body itself.</li>
    <li>The tags associated with the post.</li>
    <li>The categories into which the post has been placed.</li>
</ul>

<p>I&#8217;m sure that there are more, but this is as far as I got… so the big question is how do I mark this lot up in order to extract even more meaning?</p>

<p>The two text fields, both being content; the excerpt and post body; don&#8217;t necessarily need any container since they&#8217;re build from paragraphs. However using &lt;div&gt; would give me a lot more control over the CSS, but is this adding unnecessary mark-up?</p>

<p>I thought about creating an unordered list out of the post metadata; author, date, tags and categories. It&#8217;s all very well describing the whole lot using the ‘metadata’ label, but that&#8217;s not very helpful because they don&#8217;t belong together.</p>

<p>I figure that the tags and categories are easy since they&#8217;re obviously lists, and unordered ones at that. But the title, author and date are a different matter. Including them to a list is definitely adding extra mark—up, so I haven&#8217;t.</p>

<p>This is definitely an ongoing problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/anatomy-of-a-semantic-blog.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First impressions of MarsEdit</title>
		<link>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/first-impressions-of-marsedit.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/first-impressions-of-marsedit.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Whinfrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac User]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marsedit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jameswhinfrey.co.uk/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m writing on the 30 day trial of MarsEdit, the blog editing tool for the Mac. Given that this is my second post of the day &#8212; very rare, I know &#8212; you might have gathered that I like it. I&#8217;ve always edited my online content remotely, I have a local copy and can work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m writing on the <a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/marsedit/">30 day trial of MarsEdit</a>, the blog editing tool for the Mac.  Given that this is my second post of the day &#8212; very rare, I know &#8212; you might have gathered that I like it.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve always edited my online content remotely, I have a local copy and can work off&#8211;line. I use <a href="http://macromates.com/">TextMate</a> for most of my development work and I&#8217;ve been using it for blogging too.</p>

<p>OK&#8230; I was reluctant to change. I like having full control over mark&#8211;up and haven&#8217;t been impressed by a <acronym title="What You See Is What You Get">WYSIWYG</acronym> editor yet, for Web use at least. Untried, I ranked MarsEdit amongst them.</p>

<p>I must apologise to the developers. It&#8217;s a great and flexible tool. Hope I&#8217;ll be doing a little more blogging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conceptric.co.uk/first-impressions-of-marsedit.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

